A growing interest in narcissism as a typical, subclinical trait is observed among researchers. Recent studies show, however, substantial heterogeneity within the construct of narcissism, suggesting the existence of its two... [ view full abstract ]
A growing interest in narcissism as a typical, subclinical trait is observed among researchers. Recent studies show, however, substantial heterogeneity within the construct of narcissism, suggesting the existence of its two forms: grandiose (characterized by an inflated positive self-image, feelings of grandiosity and superiority, admiration seeking, entitlement and arrogance) and vulnerable (hypersensitivity, vulnerability, low sense of self-worth, defensiveness, and insecurity). In five studies we explored the relationship between the two types of narcissism, objective intelligence (measured with standard tests e.g. Raven’s and Cattell’s) and subjectively assessed intelligence. In studies 1-3 (ns 220 – 260) we found that grandiose (but not vulnerable) narcissism was associated with overestimation of intelligence. Moreover, grandiose narcissism correlated with other indicators of subjective view on intelligence. Specifically, we have included a construct we recently developed, i.e. satisfaction with intelligence. Again, only grandiose narcissism positively correlated with increased satisfaction with intelligence.
In study 4 we assessed heterosexual couples (n = 90). Within a couple each partner independently assessed his/her own subjective intelligence as well as his/her partner’s intelligence. Additionally, we measured objective intelligence (with Raven’s test) and two types of narcissism of each participant. The results indicated that women scoring high on grandiose narcissism tend to overestimate their own and their partners intelligence, whereas men with high grandiose narcissism overestimate their own intelligence, but underestimate their partners’ intelligence. Finally, in study 5 (n = 295) we examined narcissisms, personality, objective and subjective intelligence in a group of adolescents (Mage = 15.86, SD = 0.42). We found that grandiose narcissism was the only variable significantly (and positively) correlated with subjective intelligence, which may suggest that at this age individuals lack insight into their abilities and perception of their ability is purely narcissistic.
Our studies suggest that only grandiose type of narcissism manifest positive illusions about intelligence. Moreover, in all studies, the two narcissisms were essentially unrelated to objectively assessed intelligence.
