Background
Pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain affects over half of pregnant women worldwide. It aggravates labour pain and prolongs labour, it also increases risks of operative births.Interventions are mainly non-invasive, and exercise is recommended to reduce lumbopelvic pain in women during pregnancy. However, women usually complains of time constraint to exercise, and Chinese women are even more reluctant to perform antenatal exercise fearing that active movements may hurt the fetus. We aim to test the feasibility of a mHealth intervention advocating physical activity in Chinese women of the mid- trimester.
Method
The study is a randomized controlled trial recruiting Chinese women with a singleton pregnancy from 13th to 24th weeks’ gestation at the first hospital visit. Inclusion criteria are women without known contraindication to perform antenatal exercise and who possesses a smartphone. One hundred and thirty-four consenting women will be randomized and all participants will receive usual care including antenatal education on exercise. The intervention group will be counseled using an information booklet in local language and a smartphone application with home exercise information and demonstration tailored to our local setting. Outcomes will be measured at recruitment and 12 week afterwards.
The primary outcome is the pain level from lumbopelvic pain. Secondary outcomes include the functional disability of pain, level of physical activity, risk of antenatal depression and number of sick-leave days related to the pain.
Discussion
The study evaluates the effectiveness and feasibility of a culturally sensitive, mHealth exercise intervention in Chinese pregnant women.
References
Boissonnault, J.S., Klestinski, J.U., & Pearcy, K. (2012). The role of exercise in the management of pelvic girdle and low back pain in pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Women’s Health Physical Therapy. 36(2), 69-77.
Brown, A., & Johnston, R. (2013). Maternal experience of musculoskeletal pain during pregnancy and birth outcomes: Significance of lower back and pelvic pain. Midwifery, 29, 1346-1351.
Dørheim, S.K., Bjorvatn, B., & Eberhard-Gran, M. (2012). Sick leave during pregnancy: a longitudinal study of rates and risk factors in a Norwegian population. BJOG, 120, 521-530.
Gutke, A., Josefsson, A., & Öberg, B. (2007). Pelvic Girdle Pain and Lumbar Pain in Relation to Postpartum Depressive Symptoms. Spine, 32 (13), 1430-1436.
Lee, D.T.S., Ngai, I.S.L., Ng, M.M.T., Lok, I.H., Yip, A.S.K., Chung, T.K.H. (2009). Antenatal taboos among Chinese women in Hong Kong. Midwifery, 25, 104-113.
Liddle, S.D., & Pennick, V. (2015). Interventions for preventing and treating low back and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 9, Art. No.: CD001139.
Mogren, I. M. (2006).Perceived health, sick leave, psychosocial situation, and sexual life in women with low-back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 85, 647-656.
Robinson, H.S., Veierød, M.B., Mengshoel, A.M., & Vøllestad, N.K. (2010). Pelvic girdle pain- associations between risk factors in early pregnancy and disability or pain intensity in late pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal disorders, 11, 91.
Vermani, E., Mittal, R., & Weeks, A. (2009). Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. Pain Practice, 10(1), 60-71.
Studies of collaboration to improve maternal, infant, family, and maternity staff wellbein