This paper compares the working conditions of elite politicians and administrators. These groups allegedly have overlapping roles, which sometimes is characterized by politicians dominating managers, and in other cases as... [ view full abstract ]
This paper compares the working conditions of elite politicians and administrators. These groups allegedly have overlapping roles, which sometimes is characterized by politicians dominating managers, and in other cases as bureaucrats dominating the powerless politicians. But how do the working conditions of the political and administrative elites compare? This is a central question in order to understand not just the power balance between the two groups but also the attractiveness of recruitment into the respective professions.
We take departure in a unique survey of all Danish ministers and mayors as well as their top-administrators. This allows us to make a comparative analysis between top-politicians and top-administrators at the national as well as the local level. The survey asked respondents questions related to their overall time consume, work related pressure, the relationship between family and work, exposure to the media, and harassment/threats against the politicians or their families. More than 70% of the ministers and mayors answered the survey. The surveys were supplemented by in-depth interviews with 3 ministers, 4 mayors and 5 top-administrators concerning the same topics analyzed in NVivo. The data collection allows us to provide a unique insight into the working conditions of top politicians and compare them on a range of dimensions with top-administrators. We are furthermore able to examine the heterogeneity in working conditions between different types of politicians, specifically between elite politicians working at different layers of government (ministers versus mayors). The results indicate that top politicians work longer hours compared to their top administrators, their work-life balance is more damaging to their families, and they are to a larger extent exposed to harassment. Comparing the national and the local level politicians at the national level work longer hours, but surprisingly the politicians at the local level are equally much exposed to face-to-face harassment, though less to harassment on the social media. In comparison to the top politicians, the top administrators are less exposed to harassment. The implications of these results for the power balance between top politicians and administrators are discussed.
References:
Brenton, S. (2010): What lies beneath: the work of senators and members in the Australian Parliament, Canberra.
Vianello, M. & Moore, G. (2004). Women and Men in Political and Business Elites: A Comparative Study in the Industrialized World, London: Sage.
Weinberg, A.; C. L. Cooper & A. Weinberg (1999): Workload, stress and family life in British Members of Parliament and the psychological impact of reforms to their working hours, Stress Medicine, 15: 79-87.
Weinberg, A. & C. L. Cooper (2003): Stress among national politicians elected to the parliament for the first time, Stress and Health, 19 (2): 111-117.
Weinberg, A. (2013): A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Changes in the Job and the Expenses Scandal on UK National Politicians’ Experiences of Work, Stress and the Home-Work Interface. Parliamentary Affairs, 68 (2): 248-271.
