Careful observer, clear reporter or autonomous decision-maker? Mental Health Nurses and decision-making theory in the use of enhanced observation: A literature Review
Gearóid Brennan
University of Edinburgh
Gearóid Brennan [BA (Hons), BN, RMN] is a graduate of NUI Maynooth, having read for a double honours degree in English and German. He completed his pre-registration Mental Health nursing degree at Edinburgh Napier University. He was awarded the university medal on graduating for outstanding achievement. He is currently completing a Masters of Nursing in Clinical Research at the University of Edinburgh, funded by the Scottish Government's Chief Nursing Officer’s Directorate. He hopes to pursue a clinical academic career route. He has a keen interest in qualitative methods, the social sciences, self-harm and acute psychiatric care research. He works clinically as a staff nurse within NHS Lothian's Royal Edinburgh Hospital. When he is not researching or nursing or researching nursing, he enjoys a spot of baking, cooking, coffee and the gym.
Abstract
Reading Florence Nightingale’s Notes on Nursing (1860), it is obvious that observation had a vital role to play in the life of the nurse. She considered it essential for a nurse to be a “careful observer” and a “clear... [ view full abstract ]
Reading Florence Nightingale’s Notes on Nursing (1860), it is obvious that observation had a vital role to play in the life of the nurse. She considered it essential for a nurse to be a “careful observer” and a “clear reporter.” However how does that subservient language fit in with modern nurses who are meant to be autonomous decision-makers? The practice of observation has a different meaning in the context of acute mental health nursing. The practice of enhanced (otherwise known as ‘special’ or ‘constant’) observation is still considered a controversial and divisive intervention. Bowers and Parks (2001) argue that it is a practise based on rationality, tradition, common sense and not on evidence-based findings. More believe the practice is ineffective, untherapeutic and is contradictory to the humanistic and values-based practice of modern mental health care (Dodds and Bowles 2001). In contrast to Nightingale, Buchannan-Barker and Barker (2005) consider it to be the “original sin” of mental health nursing- an intervention from the bygone days of psychiatric nursing and the epitome of the docile nurse/doctor relationship. However literature and policy documents state that nurses are the profession that perform most enhanced observation and are often the ones to initiate it (CRAG 2002, Vråle and Steen 2005, MacKay et al 2005, Addo et al 2010). Therefore nurses have a pivotal role to play in the decision-making surrounding its practice. Nevertheless there is a paucity of literature available on mental health nurses’ decision-making processes. The aim of this paper is to explore various decision-making models which nurses use in practice. The paper will present an alternative; Standing’s (2008) Matrix of conceptions and perceptions of decision-making, which may be more applicable to a mental health setting. The literature regarding enhanced observation will be reviewed and presented in the context of Standing’s (2008) model.
Authors
-
Gearóid Brennan
(University of Edinburgh)
Topic Area
Mental health or psychosocial interventions
Session
OS-3E » OS-3 Mental Health (14:40 - Monday, 30th March, seminar room 6)
Presentation Files
The presenter has not uploaded any presentation files.