Evaluation of a cost-effective set of employment-specific assessment tools to identify individual employability and cognitive profiles of adults with autism

Background: The aim of this project was to evaluate an innovate cost-effective set of employment-specific assessment tools to identify individual profiles of employees with ASD. These tools were developed to facilitate the... [ view full abstract ]

Background: The aim of this project was to evaluate an innovate cost-effective set of employment-specific assessment tools to identify individual profiles of employees with ASD. These tools were developed to facilitate the implementation of guidelines regarding supported employment programmes for people with ASD; in particular with regard to the process of job-person matching, provision of support for employers and employees and provision of advice on reasonable adjustments

Methodology: 15 adults with autism without learning disabilities underwent assessment to identify their career preferences, profile of strengths and individual adjustments needs. The results from the assessment were used to 1) find 8-week work placements suitable to their preferences and skills, and 2) deliver person-centred training to employers on the individual needs and strengths of their employee. Effectiveness of the assessment tools was measured by a combination of standardised scales (e.g. self-esteem and mood), and a purpose-built questionnaire.

Results: Unlike previous studies, 81% of participants felt that the employer had made the right adjustments in the work place. Employees’ scores in confidence, self-esteem and mood increased significantly from baseline. By week 3, 80% of mentors reduced their support to one hour a week, yet, 91% of employees agreed that the quality of mentors’ support was very good.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that the assessment tools, and subsequent report with recommendations of adjustments, are effective in aiding the process of job-person matching, the provision of person-centred training to employers and in reducing the costs associated to provision of mentor support.

This study was scientifically and ethically reviewed, and given favourable ethical opinion by the Science Faculty Ethics Committee of the University of Portsmouth. The project was conducted under the ethical guidelines of the... [ view full abstract ]

This study was scientifically and ethically reviewed, and given favourable ethical opinion by the Science Faculty Ethics Committee of the University of Portsmouth. The project was conducted under the ethical guidelines of the British Psychological Society.

No conflict of interests have been identified.