Dark Associations: Worker Conspiracy in Racialized Antebellum Labor Climates
Rachel Banner
West Chester University of Pennsylvania
Rachel Banner, Ph.D. (UPenn 2013) is an Assistant Professor of early African American literature at West Chester University of Pennsylvania in West Chester, PA. Her research interests include antebellum African American literature, especially the work of James McCune Smith, 19th-century American legal history, and aesthetics. She has published scholarship in ESQ: A Journal of the American Renaissance, Callaloo, and J19 (Fall 2017 issue). She is at work on a book manuscript tentatively titled Blackest Sense: Radical Abolition and Sensory Aesthetics in African American Literature, 1830-1861.
Abstract
Name: Rachel BannerAffiliation: Assistant Professor, West Chester University of PennsylvaniaTitle: "Dark Associations: Worker Conspiracy in Racialized Antebellum Labor Climates"Abstract:This paper uses a somewhat... [ view full abstract ]
Name: Rachel Banner
Affiliation: Assistant Professor, West Chester University of Pennsylvania
Title: "Dark Associations: Worker Conspiracy in Racialized Antebellum Labor Climates"
Abstract:
This paper uses a somewhat unconventional archive, juridical and historical accounts of the working lives of bootblacks and bootmakers, to query the possibilities of worker association within antebellum labor climates of northern racial capitalism. In it, I work with a set of legal texts known to labor historians as the “cordwainer cases,” in which majority-white groups of bootmakers (cordwainers) in major northeastern cities were routinely accused and convicted of conspiracy for attempting to make wage pacts up through the 1840s. I re-read this archive alongside a constellation of antebellum political writings, newspaper articles, and black abolitionist texts that all invoke a particular worker-figure, the African American bootblack, to make an ideologically varied range of statements about campaigns for racial economic justice. While cordwainer associations eventually gain some legitimation via Lemuel Shaw’s ruling in Commonwealth v. Hunt (1842), I show that this legal endorsement is predicated on a differentiation of the groups’ labor value from the figure of the ‘degraded’ black manual worker, consistently figured in popular discourse as a bootblack. Turning to what I term the “bootblack archive,” I read David Walker’s 1829 Appeal as a worker’s text that cultivates a climate of labor conspiracy, and rhetorically convicts the American labor system of widespread conspiracy against people of color. I ask how juridical and cultural discourses of conspiracy operative at the time inflect Walker’s attempt to generate a collectivity of black workers who view themselves as empowered actors working to remake the U.S. labor order.
Authors
-
Rachel Banner
(West Chester University of Pennsylvania)
Topic Area
Individual paper
Session
P28 » Law and Agency (15:45 - Thursday, 22nd March, Enchantment C)
Presentation Files
The presenter has not uploaded any presentation files.