Middle range theory and the trials of 'accumulating knowledge'
Abstract
Introduction One of the ambitions of realist research is to 'accumulate a progressive authoritative body of knowledge which may be known as evaluation science' (Pawson, 2013). This round table discussion will begin with a... [ view full abstract ]
Introduction
One of the ambitions of realist research is to 'accumulate a progressive authoritative body of knowledge which may be known as evaluation science' (Pawson, 2013). This round table discussion will begin with a presentation of a method for comparing and contrasting realist projects to develop refined middle range theories. Examples will be given from two realist informed primary studies and three realist research papers which consider the delivery of effective sexual health services. A facilitated discussion will follow based on three of the key challenges when working towards middle range theory.
Proposed round table format and flow
30 mins: Explanation of the methods used to compare and contrast results including critical questioning and consideration of:
• Conceptual overlap in the original studies both in terms of: outcomes of interest, and; realist propositions and definitions.
• Researcher perspectives
• Study focus / orientation
Then:
• Theoretical overlap including critical reflection of confluent and digressive or contradictory theories
• A case for 'nested' middle range theories?
60 mins: Challenge questions - depending on size of the group could work in break out groups:
• Are these the right questions one should ask of realist data sets before attempting to triangulate it?
• In what ways do the theories proposed, in this example, deliver on the promise of middle range theory? In what ways do they not?
• How should we account for researchers' values and reflexivity to allow effective and accurate synthesis of theories?
Outcomes
Delegates should come away with a clear example of how realist projects can come together to build a body of knowledge. They will also be mindful of the tests one should apply to research findings, even with closely related aims, in order to triangulate data accurately. The discussion anticipated around the table will strengthen the methodology proposed which may lead to more robust outputs from future realist projects.
Authors
-
sue mann
(University College London)
-
Katie Shearn
(Sheffield Hallam University)
Topic Areas
Please select one of the following:: Combining Realist Evaluation and Synthesis , Please select a maximum of two themes from the following list:: Theory in Realist Approach , Please select a maximum of two themes from the following list:: Debates in Realist Inquiry
Session
RT-2 » Roundtable Session II (13:45 - Monday, 3rd October, Frobisher Room 5)
Presentation Files
The presenter has not uploaded any presentation files.