Filling a measurement gap in adult inpatient rehabilitation settings
Abstract
Background: Valid and clinically meaningful measurement of clients’ activity limitations and participation restrictions in personal and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) is important in inpatient rehabilitation... [ view full abstract ]
Background:
Valid and clinically meaningful measurement of clients’ activity limitations and participation restrictions in personal and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) is important in inpatient rehabilitation contexts. Typically, standardised assessments are not used to measure activity limitations in instrumental ADL, nor participation restrictions in both personal ADL and instrumental ADL required for community life. This is an important measurement gap. The Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) identifies clients’ participation restrictions in ADL required for community life and may fill this measurement gap (Darzins et al., 2013).
Method:
To test the internal validity of the PC-PART, data from a randomized controlled trial, involving 996 inpatient rehabilitation participants (63% women; mean age 74 years) with various impairment types, were examined by Rasch analysis (Darzins et al., 2014). A-priori hypotheses regarding responsiveness, construct and criterion validity of the PC-PART were also tested (Darzins et al., 2015).
Results:
Two unidimensional PC-PART scales fit the Rasch model: Self-Care (16 items) and Domestic Life (14 items). Both scales had acceptable internal consistency (PSI =0.85, 0.76, respectively) and well-targeted items. Ten of 13 hypotheses were supported.
Conclusion:
The PC-PART is responsive and has evidence of construct and criterion validity in inpatient rehabilitation as a measure of participation restrictions in ADL required for community life. The PC-PART fills a measurement gap for inpatient rehabilitation.
Application to Practice:
The PC-PART can help clinicians, managers and researchers measure client outcomes in a valid, clinically meaningful way.
Authors
-
Susan Darzins
(School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University)
-
Christine Imms
(Australian Catholic University)
-
Marilyn Di Stefano
(La Trobe University,)
-
Melinda Randall
(Australian Catholic University)
-
Nora Shields
(La Trobe University and Northern Health)
-
Julie Pallant
(Statistics Consultant)
-
Nicholas Taylor
(La Trobe University and Eastern Health)
Topic Areas
Europe 2020 targets and occupational therapy /science development , Horizon 2020 and occupational therapy / science research , Education / Research / Professional Challenges , Practice and intervention methods , New and innovative intervention , Evidence based practice
Session
OS - 5B » Measurement and Assessment (13:50 - Friday, 17th June, O' Flaherty Theatre )
Paper
COTEC_ENOTHE_Susan_Darzins_abstract_557_FINAL.docx