MEASURING PARTICIPATION BASED ON THE INSIDERS AND THE OUTSIDERS PERSPECTIVE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE GHENT PARTICIPATION SCALE (GPS)
Abstract
Background: The component of participation is in the ICF the embodiment of the paradigm-shift from a biomedical towards a bio-psycho-social model. By means of qualitative research a self-administered participation-measure,... [ view full abstract ]
Background:
The component of participation is in the ICF the embodiment of the paradigm-shift from a biomedical towards a bio-psycho-social model. By means of qualitative research a self-administered participation-measure, based on the insiders’ and the outsiders’ perspective has been developed using the ICF-codes and -qualifiers; the Ghent Participation Scale: GPS. It was the objective to examine the psychometric properties.
Method:
356 former rehabilitation outpatients from 6 facilities were involved. An exploratory factora-nalysis was performed to determine underlying dimensions. Statistical coherence was expressed in item-total correlations and Cronbach’s α coefficient. The Impact on participation and autonomy (IPA) and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation Participation (USER–P) were included as a reference measures to define the construct-validity. Intrarater-reliability was assessed by means of an Intra-Class-Correlation-coefficient (ICC). The standardized response mean (SRM) and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) were calculated to detect change over time.
Results:
Intrarater-reliability was shown by a strong ICC (0.894). Consistency between the items was strong (α=0.76 – 0.92). Construct-validity was shown by strong correlations between the GPS and the IPA (range, r= -0.71 to -0.87) and the User-P (range, r= 0.54 to 0.72). SRM ranged between 0.23 and 0.68 and the AUC ranged between 68 and 88%.
Conclusion:
The GPS appears to be a valid and reliable participation-measure, it is responsive and able to detect changes over time.
Application to practice:
Since it is argued that participation is a critical component in the rehabilitation process this measure could help OT’s in their clinical decision making.
Authors
-
Dominique Van de Velde
(Ghent University - Department of physiotherapy and rehabilitation sciences - Occupational Therapy Program)
-
Pascal Coorevits
(Department of Public Health of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University)
-
Lode Sabbe
(Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Ghent)
-
Stijn De Baets
(Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.)
-
Piet Bracke
(Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent)
-
Geert Van Hove
(Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium)
-
Staffan Josephsosn
(Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.)
-
Guy Vanderstraeten
(Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.)
Topic Area
Education / Research / Professional Challenges
Session
OS - 5B » Measurement and Assessment (13:50 - Friday, 17th June, O' Flaherty Theatre )
Paper
abstract_Dominique_Van_de_Velde_et_al.docx