Public participation in Observational and Experimental science: two tales from iNaturalist.org
Abstract
iNaturalist is a social network that connects people to nature through the sharing wildlife observations. To date, the platform has engaged over 50,000 people sharing nearly a million observations. But how are these... [ view full abstract ]
iNaturalist is a social network that connects people to nature through the sharing wildlife observations. To date, the platform has engaged over 50,000 people sharing nearly a million observations. But how are these contributions translated into Science?
On iNaturalist, this occurs through two separate pathways. In the former Experimental pathway, iNaturalist is a platform for hypothesis driven citizen science projects. These projects defer to the organizers to set the scientific agenda including questions and data collection protocols.
In the latter, Observational pathway, iNaturalist acts more like a sensor that gathers large qualities of data in a consistent format and makes these data available for scientific analysis.
This talk will focus on comparing these pathways as they relate to the quantity and quality of data collected, scientific significance, and also their effectiveness engaging the public and helping the public understand the scientific process.
Authors
-
Scott Loarie
(iNaturalist.org (California Academy of Sciences))
Topic Area
Digital Opportunities and Challenges in Citizen Science
Session
4E » Talks: Digital Opportunities and Challenges in Citizen Science (16:10 - Wednesday, 11th February, 230A)
Presentation Files
The presenter has not uploaded any presentation files.