Engaging in data analysis with research participants?

In this presentation I am going to explore ethical aspects of data analysis regarding the participation of research subjects, focusing on qualitative research settings (e.g. biographic and ethnographic research). Are conflicts... [ view full abstract ]

In this presentation I am going to explore ethical aspects of data analysis regarding the participation of research subjects, focusing on qualitative research settings (e.g. biographic and ethnographic research). Are conflicts of interest inevitable when interpreting accounts and narrations? Obviously, members of vulnerable groups can contribute their special context knowledge and their perspectives of being harmed, of being discredited or discreditable (cf. Goffman 1963). But are they able to analyze oppression and stigmatization? Social work researchers need to deliberate this difficult issue - and ask themselves how they construct themselves and their research subjects. It is not just a methodological but also an ethical consideration because there are power imbalances that may result in othering and consequently in silencing the 'other'. When it comes to research among social workers, it is about analysis of structures and processes of professional conduct; inherently it is also about criticism. Should social workers who act as informants in a research process take part in data analysis? Would their participation in analysis undermine a critical stance towards professional practice?
I will float these questions by giving an account of conflicts of interests I have met im my research. This, together with my colleagues' input shall serve as an introduction to the issue and lead to a moderated discussion with the audience.

DuBois, J.M. (2008). Ethics in mental health research. New York: Oxford.

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Prentice-Hall.

This presentation is planned to be part of the workshop "Addressing Conflicts of Interest in Social Work Research".