What transition concept is useful in the field of leaving care? A reflection on research interest and implication of language

Abstract for EUSARF 2016 Title: What transition concept is useful in the field of leaving care? A reflection on research interest and implication of language. By Jan Storø, Associate Professor, Oslo and Akershus University... [ view full abstract ]

Abstract for EUSARF 2016
Title: What transition concept is useful in the field of leaving care? A reflection on research interest and implication of language.
By Jan Storø, Associate Professor, Oslo and Akershus University
Mail address: jan.storo@hioa.no
Topic: Either topic 1: Historical and theoretical approaches or topic 5: Transition to adulthood from care
Format: Oral communication

Abstract:
I am about to publish an article with the title: “What transition concept is useful in the field of leaving care? A reflection on research interest and implication of language”. I would like to give a presentation based on this work.

The transition of adolescents from state care to independent living is receiving increased attention in many countries, resulting in a growing body of research. However, the concept of `transition´ remains undeveloped within this research area. One main issue in comparative work is language: how we define concepts and how we use them to analyze our findings and shape practice. As “transition” over the last decade has become the central concept in the research and practice field of social work with adolescents leaving care, we need to reflect on how its use: its possibilities, and its limitations.

I examine selected research literature on young people`s transition from state care to adulthood. My interest is: How is the concept “transition” used in 18 selected articles?

I find that transitions are described as diverse, but also that they seemingly follow patterns. This oblige us to study the possible link between normative and individual transitions. Transitions have a personal side to them, but are also influenced by cultural and structural factors. The relationship between process and outcome is crucial, and so is the time factor.

I suggest that more theorisation needs to be done within the field.