Experiences and hunter satisfaction: Applying marketing research methods
SUSAN SCHROEDER
University of Minnesota
Research Associate, Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit in the Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology at the University of Minnesota. Ph.D. in Natural Resources Science and Management from the University of Minnesota. M.S. in Natural Resource Policy and Human Dimensions in Natural Resource Management from Utah State University.
Abstract
Substantial research has examined experience preferences and multiple satisfactions associated with hunting. Marketing researchers have employed revised importance-performance (IPA), importance-grid (IGA), and... [ view full abstract ]
Substantial research has examined experience preferences and multiple satisfactions associated with hunting. Marketing researchers have employed revised importance-performance (IPA), importance-grid (IGA), and penalty-reward-contrast analyses (PRCA) for decades to examine the determinants of customer satisfaction, but these methods have seen limited application in research on hunting and other outdoor recreation activities. Using results from a 2014 mail survey of Minnesota spring turkey hunters and a 2015 mail survey of Minnesota waterfowl hunters, we applied revised IPA, IGA, and PRCA analyses to examine how variables related to pursuing and bagging turkeys and ducks related to hunter satisfaction. Results suggest differences between the explicit and implicit importance of factors related to turkey and waterfowl hunting. Employing specific preferences related to pursuing and bagging game, our results underscore the importance of harvest opportunity to hunter satisfaction. Our results parallel previous research that has found actual harvest to be less important to satisfaction, while specific success-related variables such as seeing wildlife and opportunities to harvest game along with harvest-related motivations and expectations have been found to be important predictors of satisfaction among sportspersons. Our use of penalty-reward-contrast analysis with specific preferences related to pursuing and bagging game helped to clarify the directional influence of specific hunt attributes on hunter satisfaction versus dissatisfaction. Results from the different methods provide complementary information about factors related to hunter satisfaction, and suggest management priorities for maximizing hunter satisfaction.
Authors
-
SUSAN SCHROEDER
(University of Minnesota)
-
David Fulton
(USGS, University of Minnesota)
-
Lou Cornicelli
(Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)
-
Jeffrey Lawrence
(Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)
-
Steven Merchant
(Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)
-
Steven Cordts
(Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)
Topic Areas
Topics: Wildlife, Tourism, and Recreation , Topics: Hunting and Fishing
Session
T-1A » Hunter and Angler Satisfaction and Motivation (08:00 - Tuesday, 19th September, Assembly Hall A)
Presentation Files
The presenter has not uploaded any presentation files.